Share Article
Harmonized standards in the EU Official Journal must be openly accessible free of charge - this claim of two organizations from 2019 was rejected by the European Court of Justice (ECJ) in December 2021, justifying all points of the complaint. We have summarized these contents in our article Rejected action in the case "Access to documents - Regulation (EC) 1049/2001".
Now the two organisations appealed against the judgement, and after re-examining the facts, the advocate general1 proposed in June 2023 that the Court of Justice annul the previous judgement and give a judgement that harmonised standards should be made available free of charge
The advocate General explained that, although standards are drawn up by private organisations (CEN, CENELEC and ETSI) under copyright law, in the case of harmonised standards the EU Commission acts as the body which commissions the standards or is responsible for their adoption. Compliance with harmonised standards implies a presumption of conformity with essential requirements of Union law, which is why the application of these standards is equivalent to compliance with binding rules.
However, according to the rule of law, Union law must be freely accessible, which is why harmonised standards as a means of implementation must not be protectable by copyright.
What is the current status?
On 5 March 2024, the ECJ followed the Advocate General's recommendation and announced in its ruling that the access to the 4 requested harmonised standards discussed in the case must be granted to the plaintiff side (including under the Toys Directive 2009/48/EC).
You can find all further information on this ECJ ruling in our latest article on this topic: "ECJ ruling: harmonised standards in the EU Official Journal - "Malamud" case".
Interested readers can read the entire judgment and the advocate general's opinion on the Court of Justice of the EU's website.
Through our newsletter, the CE-InfoService, we will inform you as soon as we have news from the ECJ on a new ruling.
Footnotes:1 An Advocate general is not, as the name would suggest, a public prosecutor, but a person who supports the judges of the ECJ in their decision-making. This is done within the framework of so-called "reasoned opinions", which are intended to make public, independent and impartial proposals for neutral judgement after a hearing or judgement2 For details see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advocate_general_(European_Union)
Posted on: 2024-04-29 (last amendment)
Daniel Zacek-Gebele, MSc Produktmanager bei IBF für Zusatzprodukte sowie Datenmanager für die Aktualisierung der Normendaten am Safexpert Live Server. Studium der Wirtschaftswissenschaften in Passau (BSc) und Stuttgart (MSc) im Schwerpunkt International Business and Economics.
E-Mail: daniel.zacek-gebele@ibf-solutions.com | www.ibf-solutions.com
You are not yet registered? Register now for the free CE InfoService and receive information by e-mail when new technical papers, important standards publications or other news from the field of machinery and electrical equipment safety or product compliance are available.
Register
CE software for systematic and professional safety engineering
Practical seminars on aspects of risk assessment and ce-marking
With the CE InfoService you stay informed about important developments in the field of product safety.