The EU Commission has revised the guidelines for the Machinery Directive and published the new version 2.2 on 6.11.2019.
We provide you here with a list of what we consider to be the most important innovations in the guide. Please always read the original texts of the guide and the relevant guideline points when reading it! This is not a taxonomic list of all changes!
Please also note the reference in the introduction to the guide: "It should be noted that only the Machinery Directive and the texts transposing its provisions into national law are legally binding.
The new guide 2.2 contains changes in some places compared to its predecessor version 2.1. These changes are not as extensive as the changes of version 2.1 compared to version 2.
It does not seem appropriate to list the entire content of the sometimes very extensive paragraphs here. However, wherever necessary, the part that we consider necessary for embedding the new content in the context of the guide will be listed. The new contents are bold highlighted, comments of the author italic.
Guide
Title (Version 2.1)
Content
§ 42
New notes on safety software and control "units/boards":
(...) Safety components are considered to be physical devices (like machinery or interchangeable equipment). Software which performs a safety function and which is placed independently on the market is not considered a ‘safety component’. However, physical components incorporating software and fulfilling the definition at Art 2 (c) are ‘safety components’, and may also be ‘logic units to ensure safety functions’ (item 21, Annex IV – see: §388 Categories of machinery that may be subject to one of the conformity assessment procedures involving a Notified Body).
Many machinery components are critical for the health and safety of persons. However, purely operational components, by virtue of the fourth indent in Article 2 (c) above, are not considered as safety components. Safety components are components intended by the component manufacturer to be fitted to machinery specifically to fulfil a protective role, in addition to any operational duty. Components placed independently on the market that are intended by the component manufacturer for functions that are both safety and operational functions, or that are intended by the component manufacturer to be used either for safety or for operational functions are to be considered as safety components. For example, a hydraulic valve designed and specified as being capable of performing a safety function as well as normal production use, is a “safety component” where other parts of the definition are met. However, a similar valve where the manufacturer markets it only for normal production use would not be considered a safety component. Similarly, a control unit/board delivering safety functions is a “safety component” where the other parts of the definition are met – see §417: Status of machinery control units under the Machinery Directive.
(...)
§ 46
(...) Machinery Directive does not prescribe requirements for PCM manufacturers to meet the EHSRs of Annex I. However, All EHSRs met by the PCM must be declared on the accompanying Declaration of Incorporation – see § 385: comments on Annex II 1 B. PCMs must be accompanied by assembly instructions which should include the essential information to enable safe incorporation, including, where relevant, for the final machine's control system, the relevant data on safety performance/reliability - see §417: Status of machinery control units under the Machinery Directive. This is particularly important where a control unit/board is an integral part of the PCM and delivers safety functions (note: the control board need not be supplied in the same enclosure as the PCM, but must be marketed as a single PCM product). (...)
Equipment designed and constructed specifically for use in fairground or amusement parks is excluded from the scope of the Machinery Directive by Article 1 (2) (b). This includes powered seating to contain or restrain a person, or move in response to other stimuli, such as a simulator experience, but only where specifically intended for use in fairgrounds or amusement parks (see also comments on electrically-operated furniture at §64). The design and construction of such equipment specifically intended for use in fairgrounds or amusement is not subject to any EU legislation and may therefore be subject to national regulations. It can be noted that there are two European standards for such equipment [16]. Use of such equipment by workers (for example, during erection, dismantling or maintenance operations) is subject to national provisions implementing Directive 2009/104/EC on use of work equipment by workers at work – see §140: comments on Article 15.
§ 64
§ 67
The exclusion set out in the fourth indent of Article 1 (2) (k) applies to electrical equipment such as, for example, printers, copiers, fax machines, sorters, binders and staplers.
This exclusion does not concern machinery with similar functions intended for use in industries such as, for example, the printing or paper industries, additive printing machinery for producing 3-dimentional products in home, office, laboratory or similar environments, or production printers (even when for use in office environments).
The exclusion of ordinary office machinery does not extend to electrically powered office furniture which is subject to the Machinery Directive.
§ 90
The section (line 1 in the table) relating to the Low Voltage Directive has been completely reformulated:
Electrical and electronic products that are any of the categories listed in Article 1(2) (k) of Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC (MD) shall comply with the LVD.
Electrical and electronic products that is not in any of the categories listed in Article 1(2) (k) of the MD but meet the definitions of article 2 of the MD, shall comply with the MD. It should be noted that section 1.5.1 of Annex I to the MD requires the electrical aspects of machinery to meet the safety objectives of the LVD. [..] Thus, whilst machinery with an electrical supply, which is not in any of the categories listed in Article 1(2) (k) of MD, shall fulfil the safety objectives of the LVD, the manufacturer’s EC Declaration of conformity shall not refer to the LVD but to the MD
Section relating to Regulation (EU) No 167/201348 on agricultural and forestry vehicles (minor adaptation):
This Regulation covers all identified risks including those previously covered by the Machinery Directive, for agricultural and forestry tractors, and so a complete exclusion from the Machinery Directive could be made. To do this it modified Article 1(2)(e) of the Machinery Directive, removing the reference to the exclusion being only for the risks covered by that Directive. Such tractors supplied under Regulation 167/2013 from 1 January 2016 are completely excluded from the Machinery Directive.
However, there is a two-year transition period where tractors supplied under national legislation implementing Directive 2003/37/EC can still be supplied up to 31 December 2017, and are thus also in scope of the Machinery Directive 2006/42/EC.
Title
New comments (excerpt)
§ 204
Mode selection
Note regarding reasonably foreseeable misuse:
The third paragraph of section 1.2.5 permits, as an alternative to a physically lockable selector, that selection of a control or operating mode such as, for example, a setting or maintenance mode, may be restricted to specially trained and authorised operators by other means, such as, for example, an access code.
The means used for restriction of access to the operating modes should achieve the necessary level of safety taking into account the reasonably foreseeable misuse. Where any failure in the means used for mode selection can result in danger, it must be considered an integral part of the safety-related control system.
§ 277
Hygiene requirements for machinery intended for use with foodstuffs or with cosmetics of pharmaceutical products
§ 388
Amendments concerning point 21 («Logic units for safety functions.»)
Item 21 [Bold, as headline, note] The logic units to ensure safety functions referred to in item 21 are complex components which:
The control system as a whole is not to be considered as a logic unit, although the assessment and design of the control system must fulfil EHSR 1.2.1. such that it can, to the state of the art for the product: 428 - it can withstand the intended operating stresses and external influences;
However, the way the logic is executed is technology-independent and may include mechanical, electronic and other systems that will be developed in the future. If the logic is implemented by simple devices, such as electromechanical sensors or switching devices that convert only an input signal into an output signal, they are not considered to be a logic unit. But if an input signal (or signals) is converted into an output signal by a complex device, for example an electronic circuit or a complex mechanical device that processes the signal (or signals), it is considered a logic unit for ensuring safety functions.
Such complex components can simultaneously monitor themselves or other components. However, a monitoring function is not a prerequisite for the component to be considered a logic unit.
Machinery rely on their control units for their function, which often includes ensuring safety, where failure could result in serious injury or even death. Control units/circuit boards may be placed on the market in a number of ways which affect their status under the Machinery Directive, and the extent to which conformity assessment, the preparation of a technical file and supporting information is required. A number of compliance scenarios are presented here in this table covering the range of situations commonly found so that the legal status of machinery control units/boards when placed on the market either on their own or as part of another product is clear.
The following non-exhaustive list with accompanying explanatory notes indicate which safety components are considered to be logic units to ensure safety functions in the scope of Annex VI, Item 21, and which are NOT considered to be logic units to ensure safety functions (see also the comments at §388 item 21 on categories of machinery that may be subject to one of the conformity assessment procedures involving a Notified Body).
It must be remembered that Logic Units to Ensure Safety Functions must be a Safety Component as defined by Art 2 (c) (see §42), that is a component:
Notes:
Posted on: 12.11.2019
Johannes Windeler-Frick, MSc ETH Member of the IBF management board. Specialist in CE marking and Safexpert. Presentations, podcasts and publications on various CE topics, in particular CE organisation and efficient CE management. Management of the further development of the Safexpert software system. Degree in electrical engineering from ETH Zurich (MSc) with a focus on energy technology and specialisation in the field of machine tools.
Email: johannes.windeler-frick@ibf-solutions.com | www.ibf-solutions.com
Back to overview
General InformationRisk assessmentOur Products
CE software for systematic and professional safety engineering
Practical seminars on aspects of risk assessment and ce-marking
With the CE InfoService you stay informed about important developments in the field of product safety.